Casino hotels · Washington

Angel of the Winds Casino Resort

Arlington, WA · ~649 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Angel of the Winds Casino Resort runs at 130% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Casino hotels workplace, earning a grade D.

Angel of the Winds Casino Resort: 3.9 TCR = 130% of Casino hotels BLS 3.0 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Angel of the Winds Casino Resort safety composite

Angel of the Winds Casino Resort scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2024

Angel of the Winds Casino Resort injury rate improved

Angel of the Winds Casino Resort's TCR fell 1.1 from 4.4 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.4 · 2017=4.6 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721120 · Arlington, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.9 · 130% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #5/8
  • PHOTO Talking Stick Resort
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 191 inj
  • SIZE ~649 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Talking Stick Resort (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Angel of the Winds Casino Resort in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Angel of the Winds Casino Resort averages 3.9 TCR (130% of the Casino hotels BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Angel of the Winds Casino Resort TCR series: 2016=4.4 · 2017=4.6 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 3.0

Where Angel of the Winds Casino Resort falls in its industry

381 Casino hotels establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 8 Casino hotels employers in Washington.

Angel of the Winds Casino Resort (649 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 725 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Angel of the Winds Casino Resort
Angel of the Winds Casino Resort (649 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 725 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Angel of the Winds Casino Resort has fewer employees than the Casino hotels median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 2.5 21 1 0
2023 3.7 2.2 23 1 0
2022 1.6 1.1 10 0 0
2021 3.3 2.3 18 2 0
2020 5.3 4.2 27 0 0
2019 5.2 4.1 28 1 0
2018 3.8 3.4 21 0 0
2017 4.6 3.6 23 1 0
2016 4.4 3.2 20 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721120 · WA · Arlington

381 Casino hotels employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 58 employers in Arlington, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Talking Stick Resort 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prairie Band Casino & Resort 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tropicana Evansville 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wild Horse Pass Hotel & Casino 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE RDMDWAMF - AT&T Services, Inc. 650 FTE
STATE-SIZE RDMDWASI 648 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Puget Sound Community College 648 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benton County 650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - PAE2 2,265 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3757 325 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3757 300 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Erection Company 229 FTE
NAT-TCR Plant 48 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cypress Store #2308 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Paragon Industries, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR CGH Medical Center Warehouse 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Dow Chemical Company - Collegeville, PA 649 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bard Shannon Ltd 649 FTE
NAT-SIZE R+L Carriers - ATL 649 FTE
NAT-SIZE MetroAtlanta Ambulance Service 649 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.