Otolaryngologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · South Carolina

AnMed Health Medicus Ear Nose Throat

Anderson, SC · ~22 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AnMed Health Medicus Ear Nose Throat runs at 275% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Otolaryngologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade F.

AnMed Health Medicus Ear Nose Throat: 10.4 TCR = 275% of Otolaryngologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AnMed Health Medicus Ear Nose Throat safety composite

AnMed Health Medicus Ear Nose Throat scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

AnMed Health Medicus Ear Nose Throat: 5.1 → 15.8 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 15.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2018

AnMed Health Medicus Ear Nose Throat's TCR rose 10.7 from 5.1 in 2017 to 15.8 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Anderson, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.4 · 275% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #61/64
  • PHOTO Sutter Valley Medica…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30527) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

AnMed Health Medicus Ear Nose Throat in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AnMed Health Medicus Ear Nose Throat averages 10.4 TCR (275% of the Otolaryngologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AnMed Health Medicus Ear Nose Throat TCR series: 2017=5.1 · 2018=15.8 · BLS 3.8

Where AnMed Health Medicus Ear Nose Throat falls in its industry

2,836 Otolaryngologists' offices (e. establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 64 Otolaryngologists' offices (e. employers in South Carolina.

AnMed Health Medicus Ear Nose Throat (22 employees, TCR 10.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate AnMed Health Medicus Ear Nose Throat
AnMed Health Medicus Ear Nose Throat (22 employees, TCR 10.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

AnMed Health Medicus Ear Nose Throat has fewer employees than the Otolaryngologists' offices (e.g., center median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 15.8 0.0 3 0 0
2017 5.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · SC · Anderson

2,836 Otolaryngologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 167 employers in Anderson, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30527) 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allina Health Cottage Grove Clinic 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MarinHealth Medical Group 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Family HealthCare Network - Fresno ACC 10.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE ISE Newberry Liquid Plant 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Summerville SC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allendale Biomass LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenville Business Office 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR AnMed Medical Center 2,374 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anmed Health Medical Center 1,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bosch AdP 1,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdP 1,314 FTE
NAT-TCR Polymar 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR K & Y Floor Coverings Co 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Atlanta Airport South 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pullman Building Supply 10.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE UG2 -583 - One Channel Center (MA) 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gordon 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE DeAngelo Brothers Mount Jackson 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paso Robles Tank - Brown Minneapolis Tank 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.