Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential · Florida

Ann Storck Center, Inc.

Fort Lauderdale, FL · ~334 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ann Storck Center, Inc. runs at 279% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential workplace, earning a grade F.

Ann Storck Center, Inc.: 10.6 TCR = 279% of Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ann Storck Center, Inc. safety composite

Ann Storck Center, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2016→2017

Ann Storck Center, Inc. injury rate improved

Ann Storck Center, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.2 from 12.2 in 2016 to 9.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.2 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.2 · 2017=9.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Fort Lauderdale, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.6 · 279% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #67/92
  • PHOTO 7000-14353
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 59 inj
  • SIZE ~334 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 7000-14353 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Ann Storck Center, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ann Storck Center, Inc. averages 10.6 TCR (279% of the Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ann Storck Center, Inc. TCR series: 2016=12.2 · 2017=9 · BLS 3.8

Where Ann Storck Center, Inc. falls in its industry

2,261 Intellectual and developmental establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #67 safest of 92 Intellectual and developmental employers in Florida.

Ann Storck Center, Inc. (334 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Ann Storck Center, Inc.
Ann Storck Center, Inc. (334 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Ann Storck Center, Inc. has more employees than the Intellectual and developmental disabilit median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 9.0 5.0 25 0 0
2016 12.2 10.0 34 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · FL · Fort Lauderdale

2,261 Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 374 employers in Fort Lauderdale, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 7000-14353 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mahan Homes 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7000-14902 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Creating a legacy inc 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Halkey Roberts 334 FTE
STATE-SIZE JM Lexus 334 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1605 334 FTE
STATE-SIZE 778 334 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spirit Airlines - FLL 3,426 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Long Term Care Inc 2,979 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Lauderdale (FLL) 2,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hotwire Communications - Cypress 953 FTE
NAT-TCR Midland (Txmid) 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tmx2038 - San Diego Fumigation 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR KY-01 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Oak Charlotte 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE UGN-Valparaiso 334 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Research 334 FTE
NAT-SIZE IRV-HCT-IRVING 334 FTE
NAT-SIZE FRS 334 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.