Drywall contractors · Georgia

Anning-Johnson Company Georgia

Atlanta, GA · ~160 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anning-Johnson Company Georgia runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Drywall contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Anning-Johnson Company Georgia: 0.8 TCR = 30% of Drywall contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anning-Johnson Company Georgia safety composite

Anning-Johnson Company Georgia scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2023

Anning-Johnson Company Georgia injury rate improved

Anning-Johnson Company Georgia's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.6 in 2016 to 0.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.6 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238310 · Atlanta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 30% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/31
  • PHOTO Pillar Construction …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~160 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pillar Construction VA, MD, DC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Anning-Johnson Company Georgia in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anning-Johnson Company Georgia averages 0.8 TCR (30% of the Drywall contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anning-Johnson Company Georgia TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=0.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Anning-Johnson Company Georgia falls in its industry

1,613 Drywall contractors establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 31 Drywall contractors employers in Georgia.

Anning-Johnson Company Georgia (160 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Anning-Johnson Company Georgia
Anning-Johnson Company Georgia (160 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Anning-Johnson Company Georgia has more employees than the Drywall contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.8 0.6 3 0 0
2021 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2017 1.6 0.0 3 0 0
2016 1.6 1.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238310 · GA · Atlanta

1,613 Drywall contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pillar Construction VA, MD, DC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCI Seattle Industrial ISS 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acoustics & Specialties, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Industrial Insulation 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Headquarters 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benning DPW 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE DYMA Brands (Formally Diamond Crystal Brands) Bremen 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE Specialty Fabrics & Converting 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR BT San Diego 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Spike Enterprise, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Colite 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Family Centered, Residential,Adoption, Counseling, Main Office and School main Campus 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE tkSCS Sterling Heights/Warren 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bio-Lab, INC 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lancaster EMS - LTFD 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lancaster EMS - Conestoga 160 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.