Heavy equipment repair training · Minnesota

Anoka Technical College

Anoka, MN · ~126 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anoka Technical College runs at 122% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Heavy equipment repair training workplace, earning a grade D.

Anoka Technical College: 1.7 TCR = 122% of Heavy equipment repair training BLS 1.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anoka Technical College safety composite

Anoka Technical College scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Anoka Technical College: 0.0 → 2.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.04× in 2024

Anoka Technical College's TCR rose 2.7 from 0.0 in 2017 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611519 · Anoka, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 1.7 · 122% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO Ziegler BLoomington
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~126 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ziegler BLoomington (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Anoka Technical College in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anoka Technical College averages 1.7 TCR (122% of the Heavy equipment repair training BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anoka Technical College TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 1.4

Where Anoka Technical College falls in its industry

13 Heavy equipment repair trainin establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Heavy equipment repair trainin employers in Minnesota.

Anoka Technical College (126 employees, TCR 1.7) among 8 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Mount Carmel College of NursingSamuel Merritt University (215-350HAW)Dakota County Technical CollegeCARLETON EQUIPMENT CO - KALAMAZOOSamuel Merritt University (215-OAK)The CrucibleZiegler BLoomingtonSamuel Merritt University (215-SAC)Anoka Technical College
Anoka Technical College (126 employees, TCR 1.7) among 8 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Anoka Technical College has more employees than the Heavy equipment repair training median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 1.8 3 0 0
2023 1.8 0.9 2 0 0
2022 3.6 1.8 4 0 0
2021 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.4 1.6 3 0 0
2018 2.4 2.4 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611519 · MN · Anoka

13 Heavy equipment repair training employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 100 employers in Anoka, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ziegler BLoomington 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR DBJJDM Enterprises, LLC dba WyoTech 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR DBJJDM Enterprises DBA Wyotech 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dakota County Technical College 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE PCL Construction Services, Inc. 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE 458490 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE White Bear Lake Container 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE InTech Industries Inc. MN 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR Federal Cartridge Company 1,582 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hoffman Enclosures Inc 1,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hoffman Industries, LLC 1,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR Educational Service Center 1,095 FTE
NAT-TCR Falcon Electric inc 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bill Doran LLC - Dallas 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR TK Elevator Albuquerque 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR TK Elevator Fargo 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE ShopRite of Huntington 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gr Rapids Home for Vet - Dmva 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Limoneira Company-Santa Paula 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Opportunity House, Inc. 126 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.