Nursing homes · Georgia

Ansley Park Health and Rehabilitation

Newnan, GA · ~76 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ansley Park Health and Rehabilitation runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade D.

Ansley Park Health and Rehabilitation: 8.6 TCR = 132% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ansley Park Health and Rehabilitation safety composite

Ansley Park Health and Rehabilitation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ansley Park Health and Rehabilitation: 1.7 → 10.8 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 15.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.26× in 2023

Ansley Park Health and Rehabilitation's TCR rose 9.2 from 1.7 in 2016 to 10.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 15.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Newnan, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.6 · 132% of ind

  • DART 10.8 DART
  • RANK #147/259
  • PHOTO Maryhill Manor, Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maryhill Manor, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Ansley Park Health and Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ansley Park Health and Rehabilitation averages 8.6 TCR (132% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ansley Park Health and Rehabilitation TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=15 · 2018=8.7 · 2019=7.4 · 2020=9.6 · 2022=7 · 2023=10.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Ansley Park Health and Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #147 safest of 259 Nursing homes employers in Georgia.

Ansley Park Health and Rehabilitation (76 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ansley Park Health and Rehabilitation
Ansley Park Health and Rehabilitation (76 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Ansley Park Health and Rehabilitation has fewer employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 10.8 10.8 0 6 0
2022 7.0 7.0 0 9 0
2020 9.6 9.6 4 0 0
2019 7.4 4.9 2 1 0
2018 8.7 0.0 4 0 0
2017 15.0 2.5 6 0 0
2016 1.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · GA · Newnan

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 147 employers in Newnan, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maryhill Manor, Inc. 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone Caregiving, Inc DBA Home Instead #352 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westchester Gardens health and Rehabilitation 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harrison Senior Living of Coatesville 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Birdsong Peanuts Sylvester 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant Hammond 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Noah's Ark Operating 1704 Noah's Ark Rd Jonesboro 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gilbane Building Company Atlanta 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - CSG1 2,498 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation 1,585 FTE
CITY-NEAR GA01 - Newnan Fulfillment Center 1,406 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Newnan Hospital 1,205 FTE
NAT-TCR WPAX 1953 (Alburtis - F) 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Baptist Health Paducah Hospital 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Saint Elizabeth Medical Center 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bnd Plastering Inc 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Woodrow Wilson Elementary School 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Decal Company, Inc 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE KPC Promise Hospital of Dallas 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE KPC Promise SNF of Wichita Falls 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.