Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Colorado

Anthem Kipling Management, LLC

Littleton, CO · ~59 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anthem Kipling Management, LLC runs at 426% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Anthem Kipling Management, LLC: 16.2 TCR = 426% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anthem Kipling Management, LLC safety composite

Anthem Kipling Management, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Anthem Kipling Management, LLC: 16.8 → 70.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 70.5 TCR · DART/TCR 4.35× in 2020

Anthem Kipling Management, LLC's TCR rose 53.7 from 16.8 in 2016 to 70.5 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 4.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Littleton, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.2 · 426% of ind

  • DART 70.5 DART
  • RANK #66/75
  • PHOTO Friendship Village
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Friendship Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Anthem Kipling Management, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anthem Kipling Management, LLC averages 16.2 TCR (426% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anthem Kipling Management, LLC TCR series: 2016=16.8 · 2017=22 · 2018=18.1 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=70.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Anthem Kipling Management, LLC falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #66 safest of 75 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Colorado.

Anthem Kipling Management, LLC (59 employees, TCR 16.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Anthem Kipling Management, LLC
Anthem Kipling Management, LLC (59 employees, TCR 16.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Anthem Kipling Management, LLC has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 70.5 70.5 4 22 0
2019 7.8 0.0 3 0 0
2018 18.1 18.1 9 0 0
2017 22.0 12.0 11 0 0
2016 16.8 7.5 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CO · Littleton

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 238 employers in Littleton, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Friendship Village 16.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belmont Village - Los Gatos 16.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Franklin United Methodist Community dba Otterbein Franklin 16.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jackson Creek Senior Living 16.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Faulkner Dairy II 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE FRESH HARVEST INC- COLORADO 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE CAM Industrial Solutions @ Suncor Commerce City 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Worley Field Services at Suncor Commerce City 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Waterton Campus (1004) 5,542 FTE
CITY-NEAR Littleton Adventist Hospital 1,563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US CO Littleton Deer Crk Cnyn (1003) 1,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Littleton 1,174 FTE
NAT-TCR Isabella USDA 16.2 TCR
NAT-TCR F & W Foodservices 16.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Zoological Society of Sioux Falls 16.2 TCR
NAT-TCR MidCountry Homes 16.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Foremost Farms - Marshfield 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE TranSource Raleigh 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 0416 Salisbury 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Save A Lot #198 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.