Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly · Missouri

Anthology of Burlington Creek

Kansas City, MO · ~141 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
20.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anthology of Burlington Creek runs at 527% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly workplace, earning a grade F.

Anthology of Burlington Creek: 20.0 TCR = 527% of Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anthology of Burlington Creek safety composite

Anthology of Burlington Creek scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 20.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−18.0

2022→2023

Anthology of Burlington Creek injury rate improved

Anthology of Burlington Creek's TCR fell 18.0 from 29.0 in 2022 to 11.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 29.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=29.0 · 2023=11.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Kansas City, MO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 20.0 · 527% of ind

  • DART 6.3 DART
  • RANK #106/106
  • PHOTO Columbia Cottage Lin…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~141 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Columbia Cottage Linglestown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Anthology of Burlington Creek in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anthology of Burlington Creek averages 20.0 TCR (527% of the Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anthology of Burlington Creek TCR series: 2022=29 · 2023=11 · BLS 3.8

Where Anthology of Burlington Creek falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted Living Facilities for establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #106 safest of 106 Assisted Living Facilities for employers in Missouri.

Anthology of Burlington Creek (141 employees, TCR 20.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Anthology of Burlington Creek
Anthology of Burlington Creek (141 employees, TCR 20.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Anthology of Burlington Creek has more employees than the Assisted Living Facilities for the Elder median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 11.0 6.3 7 0 0
2022 29.0 20.7 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MO · Kansas City

6,510 Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 1,023 employers in Kansas City, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Columbia Cottage Linglestown 20.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gothenburg Senior Living LLC 20.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood - Spring Wind 20.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gables of Brigham City 20.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Thomas Industrial Coatings Inc. & Thomas Equipment and Management 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE NextPage 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Owens Corning Thermafiber Joplin 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Doing Steel Fabrication LLC 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mass Service Organization 11,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hallmark Cards Mass Channel 11,578 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Merchandising Services (GMS) 9,548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Mercy - Missouri 7,709 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 1210 20.0 TCR
NAT-TCR J. Arthur Trudeau Memorial Center 20.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 6957-LFT 20.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZYAK 20.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Toby Wells Family YMCA 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Puyallup Office 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Feldmeier Equipment Mill Street 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pinckneyville IL 141 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.