Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · Oklahoma

APAC Central - Tulsa Construction

Tulsa, OK · ~53 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

APAC Central - Tulsa Construction runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade B.

APAC Central - Tulsa Construction: 2.0 TCR = 71% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

APAC Central - Tulsa Construction safety composite

APAC Central - Tulsa Construction scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2018→2019

APAC Central - Tulsa Construction injury rate improved

APAC Central - Tulsa Construction's TCR fell 4.0 from 4.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Tulsa, OK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 71% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/43
  • PHOTO E. S. Wagner Company
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: E. S. Wagner Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

APAC Central - Tulsa Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows APAC Central - Tulsa Construction averages 2.0 TCR (71% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

APAC Central - Tulsa Construction TCR series: 2018=4 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.8

Where APAC Central - Tulsa Construction falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 43 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in Oklahoma.

APAC Central - Tulsa Construction (53 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate APAC Central - Tulsa Construction
APAC Central - Tulsa Construction (53 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

APAC Central - Tulsa Construction has fewer employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.0 4.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · OK · Tulsa

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,004 employers in Tulsa, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR E. S. Wagner Company 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Millstone Weber - Total Company 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rebcon LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR California 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tulsa - Borets U.S. Inc 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Titan Construction LLC 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Iochem-OK 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital, Inc. 6,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR H&P IDC - U.S. Land 6,014 FTE
CITY-NEAR TUL-TULSA-MAINTENANCE BASE 5,184 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-TUL-TULSA-TUL-TRML 4,794 FTE
NAT-TCR Bloomfield WECO 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Thomas Hospital for Speciality Surgery 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Greenville High School 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hatzel & Buehler, Inc. NY 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Orono ISD #278-Early Childhood Center 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Albert Arno Inc 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Longview 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cy-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Cary 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.