Fiber optic cable transmission line construction · Colorado

apeiron utility construction

Grand Junction, CO · ~39 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

apeiron utility construction runs at 214% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fiber optic cable transmission line construction workplace, earning a grade F.

apeiron utility construction: 6.0 TCR = 214% of Fiber optic cable transmission line construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

apeiron utility construction safety composite

apeiron utility construction scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

apeiron utility construction: 3.2 → 5.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 8.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.31× in 2024

apeiron utility construction's TCR rose 2.3 from 3.2 in 2019 to 5.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Grand Junction, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.0 · 214% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #54/65
  • PHOTO SunTalk
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SunTalk (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

apeiron utility construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows apeiron utility construction averages 6.0 TCR (214% of the Fiber optic cable transmission line construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

apeiron utility construction TCR series: 2019=3.2 · 2020=5 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=8 · 2023=8.7 · 2024=5.5 · BLS 2.8

Where apeiron utility construction falls in its industry

1,605 Fiber optic cable transmission establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 65 Fiber optic cable transmission employers in Colorado.

apeiron utility construction (39 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate apeiron utility construction
apeiron utility construction (39 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

apeiron utility construction has fewer employees than the Fiber optic cable transmission line cons median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.5 1.8 2 1 0
2023 8.7 6.5 4 0 0
2022 8.0 4.0 4 0 0
2021 5.6 3.8 3 0 0
2020 5.0 2.5 2 0 0
2019 3.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · CO · Grand Junction

1,605 Fiber optic cable transmission line construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 233 employers in Grand Junction, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SunTalk 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR D.V.M. Utilities, Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR GSU:GS400 - GS400-GSU - Fremont, CA 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR KENNEDY NETWORK SERVICES, INC. 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Los Suenos 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE RimRock Oil & Gas 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vantage 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital 2,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital and Medical Center 2,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Hospital 1,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hilltop Health Services Corporation- 609 27 1/2 Road 641 FTE
NAT-TCR Frantz Wholesale Nursery LLC 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR J & J Sugar Harvesters Inc 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sheraton Broadway Resort 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Shiloh Industries LLC Wellington 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fieldale Farms - Murrayville Live Haul 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Union City 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Transportation 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tiny Town 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.