Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · California

Apollo Couriers

Inglewood, CA · ~209 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Apollo Couriers runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade A.

Apollo Couriers: 2.9 TCR = 45% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Apollo Couriers safety composite

Apollo Couriers scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 2.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2019→2023

Apollo Couriers injury rate improved

Apollo Couriers's TCR fell 0.8 from 3.7 in 2019 to 2.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.7 · 2020=0.1 · 2021=4.9 · 2023=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Inglewood, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.9 · 45% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #51/710
  • PHOTO AOS Logistics LLC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 80 inj
  • SIZE ~209 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AOS Logistics LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Apollo Couriers in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Apollo Couriers averages 2.9 TCR (45% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Apollo Couriers TCR series: 2019=3.7 · 2020=0.1 · 2021=4.9 · 2023=2.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Apollo Couriers falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #51 safest of 710 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in California.

Apollo Couriers (209 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Apollo Couriers
Apollo Couriers (209 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Apollo Couriers has more employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.9 2.9 4 0 0
2021 4.9 4.2 7 0 0
2020 0.1 0.1 31 3 0
2019 3.7 3.4 38 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · CA · Inglewood

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 89 employers in Inglewood, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AOS Logistics LLC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 708160000 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highroad Logistics Enterprises 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR OKCLI - CLINTON 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Valle Del Sol 209 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA-Dominguez Hills S/C 209 FTE
STATE-SIZE CENTRAL DISTRICT - POWER 209 FTE
STATE-SIZE Christian Brothers Mechanical Services, Inc. 209 FTE
CITY-NEAR Centinela Hospital Medical Center 1,212 FTE
CITY-NEAR Golden Gate America West LAX 613 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flying Food Group, LLC. 394 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0769 - INGLEWOOD CA WHSE 335 FTE
NAT-TCR Pettus Logistics, LLC 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #5271 Taylor, MI 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #5122 Marietta, GA 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1795 Witchita, KS 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sandoz Field Force 209 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lincoln Ave Wi 209 FTE
NAT-SIZE GNC Distribution - Whitestown 209 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sapphire Nursing at Meadow hill 209 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.