Skilled nursing facilities · Connecticut

Apple Rehab Farmington Valley

Plainville, CT · ~177 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Apple Rehab Farmington Valley runs at 146% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Apple Rehab Farmington Valley: 9.5 TCR = 146% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Apple Rehab Farmington Valley safety composite

Apple Rehab Farmington Valley scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Apple Rehab Farmington Valley: 9.0 → 143.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 143.1 TCR · DART/TCR 8.86× in 2023

Apple Rehab Farmington Valley's TCR rose 134.0 from 9.0 in 2016 to 143.1 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 8.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Plainville, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 9.5 · 146% of ind

  • DART 84.2 DART
  • RANK #123/258
  • PHOTO Centerburg Pointe
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 96 inj
  • SIZE ~177 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Centerburg Pointe (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Apple Rehab Farmington Valley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Apple Rehab Farmington Valley averages 9.5 TCR (146% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Apple Rehab Farmington Valley TCR series: 2016=9 · 2017=8.3 · 2018=13 · 2019=9.2 · 2020=17.8 · 2021=0.1 · 2022=9 · 2023=143.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Apple Rehab Farmington Valley falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #123 safest of 258 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Connecticut.

Apple Rehab Farmington Valley (177 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Apple Rehab Farmington Valley
Apple Rehab Farmington Valley (177 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Apple Rehab Farmington Valley has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 143.1 84.2 17 0 0
2022 9.0 2.7 9 1 0
2021 0.1 0.1 16 0 0
2020 17.8 15.1 8 12 0
2019 9.2 8.4 12 0 0
2018 13.0 11.5 17 0 0
2017 8.3 7.5 9 1 0
2016 9.0 6.6 8 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CT · Plainville

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 59 employers in Plainville, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Centerburg Pointe 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Broad Mountain Nursing Home 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riviera Healthcare Center 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLINTON GARDENS 9.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Smith & Wesson Precision Components Plastics, 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE EASTCONN Transportation 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ragozzino Foods, INC 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fluid Connectors : New Britain 176 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wheeler Clinic 495 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Offices 462 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gems Sensors Plainville 377 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gems Sensors 288 FTE
NAT-TCR Twin Pines North Nursing and Rehab 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Tormenta FC, LLC 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Repro Graphics 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR MCROpp New York Royal44 Tenant LLC 9.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE C411 Charleston 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE 10380 Medford (WO) 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boxley Materials Company 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE Department of Streets & Sanitation - Bureau of Traffic Services 177 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.