Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Wisconsin

Appleton Retirement Community

Appleton, WI · ~55 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Appleton Retirement Community runs at 171% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Appleton Retirement Community: 6.5 TCR = 171% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Appleton Retirement Community safety composite

Appleton Retirement Community scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Appleton Retirement Community: 5.3 → 7.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 10.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.19× in 2019

Appleton Retirement Community's TCR rose 2.4 from 5.3 in 2016 to 7.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 1.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Appleton, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.5 · 171% of ind

  • DART 7.7 DART
  • RANK #95/171
  • PHOTO Century Ridge 3
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Century Ridge 3 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Appleton Retirement Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Appleton Retirement Community averages 6.5 TCR (171% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Appleton Retirement Community TCR series: 2016=5.3 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=10.2 · 2019=7.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Appleton Retirement Community falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #95 safest of 171 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

Appleton Retirement Community (55 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Appleton Retirement Community
Appleton Retirement Community (55 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Appleton Retirement Community has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 7.7 7.7 2 0 0
2018 10.2 0.0 0 3 0
2017 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2016 5.3 5.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · WI · Appleton

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 356 employers in Appleton, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Century Ridge 3 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Focused Care at Pecos 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Symphony at Olmsted Falls 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bethany Village 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Siemers Holstein Farm, Inc. - Main Farm 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Substation 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Luamben Green Service Corp 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE KOHLER SERVICE ORGANIZATION 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center Appleton 1,649 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center-Appleton 1,563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Operations 1,321 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fox Valley Technical College (WI) 1,279 FTE
NAT-TCR Max & Erma's Edinburgh 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Watsonville Post Acute Center 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Chicago Dept of Fleet and Facility Management - 900 E. 103rd St 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sierra Vista Healthcare Center 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Woolpert- Denver 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wakefield Farms LLP 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Covanta Hillsborough, Inc. 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zion Nuclear Power Station Demolition 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.