Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade · Tennessee

Applied Thermal Coatings, Inc

Chattanooga, TN · ~21 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Applied Thermal Coatings, Inc runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade C.

Applied Thermal Coatings, Inc: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Applied Thermal Coatings, Inc safety composite

Applied Thermal Coatings, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Applied Thermal Coatings, Inc held a steady TCR band

Applied Thermal Coatings, Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Chattanooga, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/6
  • PHOTO Parker Trutec
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Parker Trutec (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Applied Thermal Coatings, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Applied Thermal Coatings, Inc averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Applied Thermal Coatings, Inc TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Applied Thermal Coatings, Inc falls in its industry

248 Heat treating metals and metal establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 6 Heat treating metals and metal employers in Tennessee.

Applied Thermal Coatings, Inc (21 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Applied Thermal Coatings, Inc
Applied Thermal Coatings, Inc (21 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Applied Thermal Coatings, Inc has fewer employees than the Heat treating metals and metal products median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · TN · Chattanooga

248 Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 695 employers in Chattanooga, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Parker Trutec 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superheat FGH Services 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paulo - Headquarters 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Analytic Stress Relieving, LLC 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE SOUTH TEXAS FARM 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenpoint Ag- Gin & Warehouse 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Johnson Pest Control, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Obion County Growout 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA COKE 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR USXpress 7,385 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardiology GB 6,606 FTE
NAT-TCR Envision Printing, LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cedar Bay Entertainment LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR One Federal Street 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Empire Truck Sales - Biloxi 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hollister Service Center 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE 32 Eagle 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE 31 Steamboat Springs 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.