Janitorial services · Alabama

Arbor Springs Health and Rehab (Housekeeping)

Opelika, AL · ~21 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arbor Springs Health and Rehab (Housekeeping) runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Janitorial services workplace, earning a grade B.

Arbor Springs Health and Rehab (Housekeeping): 2.4 TCR = 53% of Janitorial services BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arbor Springs Health and Rehab (Housekeeping) safety composite

Arbor Springs Health and Rehab (Housekeeping) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Arbor Springs Health and Rehab (Housekeeping) held a steady TCR band

Arbor Springs Health and Rehab (Housekeeping)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 13.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=13.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Opelika, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/70
  • PHOTO Marlborough Hospital…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Marlborough Hospital EVS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Arbor Springs Health and Rehab (Housekeeping) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arbor Springs Health and Rehab (Housekeeping) averages 2.4 TCR (53% of the Janitorial services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arbor Springs Health and Rehab (Housekeeping) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=13.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Arbor Springs Health and Rehab (Housekeeping) falls in its industry

4,064 Janitorial services establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 70 Janitorial services employers in Alabama.

Arbor Springs Health and Rehab (Housekeeping) (21 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Arbor Springs Health and Rehab (Housekeeping)
Arbor Springs Health and Rehab (Housekeeping) (21 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Arbor Springs Health and Rehab (Housekeeping) has fewer employees than the Janitorial services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 13.4 13.4 0 2 0
2019 5.8 5.8 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · AL · Opelika

4,064 Janitorial services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 87 employers in Opelika, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Marlborough Hospital EVS 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairview Park - EVS 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 155377 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR TLC FAMILY CARE-TN 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Koch Foods Breeder/Broilers Techs 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE IndusTREE Timber, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillsboro Gin Company Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Koch Foods Gadsden Live Haul 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6095 849 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6095 843 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mando America Corporation 493 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hanwha Advanced Materials America LLC. Opelika 470 FTE
NAT-TCR JCS Tool and Manufacturing Inc 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Joint Township District Memorial Hospital 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Indiana Convention Center / Lucas Oil Stadium 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Expanded Technologies Corp 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bcc Main Office 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raymondville Facility 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norfolk - NFK 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chino RDC 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.