Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · New Jersey

Arbor Terrace Teaneck

Teaneck, NJ · ~53 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arbor Terrace Teaneck runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade A.

Arbor Terrace Teaneck: 2.0 TCR = 31% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arbor Terrace Teaneck safety composite

Arbor Terrace Teaneck scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2020

Arbor Terrace Teaneck injury rate improved

Arbor Terrace Teaneck's TCR fell 0.5 from 3.0 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Teaneck, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.0 · 31% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #15/370
  • PHOTO Breckenridge Commons
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Breckenridge Commons (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Arbor Terrace Teaneck in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arbor Terrace Teaneck averages 2.0 TCR (31% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arbor Terrace Teaneck TCR series: 2016=3 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Arbor Terrace Teaneck falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 370 Convalescent homes or convales employers in New Jersey.

Arbor Terrace Teaneck (53 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Arbor Terrace Teaneck
Arbor Terrace Teaneck (53 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Arbor Terrace Teaneck has fewer employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2016 3.0 3.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NJ · Teaneck

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 18 employers in Teaneck, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Breckenridge Commons 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sycamorespring 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Portside Health and Rehabilitation 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chicago Ridge 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 4039-03601100-00W001 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE J. Servidone Jr. Equipment & Sales 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.D'Annunzio & Sons Inc. 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franklin Township Public Works 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Ridge Senior Housing, LLC 346 FTE
CITY-NEAR Qcells Enable LLC 245 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAREONE AT TEANECK 212 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marriott Teaneck 187 FTE
NAT-TCR OH201 West Chester Trey 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1078 Cincinnati, OH 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 0022-Community Care Partners 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Town of East Haven Social & Welfare Srvs, Counseling & Community Srvcs, Senior Center 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1855-WIMIL94 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : FWA - Fort Wayne 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chicago Marriott Suites Deerfield 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Three S Enterprises, Inc. 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.