Nursing homes · Ohio

Arbors at Carroll

Carroll, OH · ~86 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arbors at Carroll runs at 152% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade D.

Arbors at Carroll: 9.9 TCR = 152% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arbors at Carroll safety composite

Arbors at Carroll scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.9

2016→2024

Arbors at Carroll injury rate improved

Arbors at Carroll's TCR fell 8.9 from 10.9 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 21.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.9 · 2017=12.3 · 2018=16.6 · 2019=21.7 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=18.2 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Carroll, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 9.9 · 152% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #766/1074
  • PHOTO Charleston Healthcar…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 45 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Charleston Healthcare Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Arbors at Carroll in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arbors at Carroll averages 9.9 TCR (152% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arbors at Carroll TCR series: 2016=10.9 · 2017=12.3 · 2018=16.6 · 2019=21.7 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=18.2 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=2 · BLS 6.5

Where Arbors at Carroll falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #766 safest of 1074 Nursing homes employers in Ohio.

Arbors at Carroll (86 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Arbors at Carroll
Arbors at Carroll (86 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Arbors at Carroll has fewer employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2023 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2022 3.3 1.6 1 1 0
2021 18.2 18.2 1 11 0
2020 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2019 21.7 14.5 12 0 0
2018 16.6 11.6 10 0 0
2017 12.3 4.6 8 0 0
2016 10.9 6.8 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · OH · Carroll

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 14 employers in Carroll, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Charleston Healthcare Center 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harrison House Assisted Living 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Progressive Macedonia 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lutheran Home and Serv For The Aged 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Preferred Real Estate Investments Inc 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Welty Building Company 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Custom Agri Systems - Napoleon 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE 104157 - Timber Road IV Wind Farm 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thompson Concrete Construction Ltd. 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR CW Carroll Branch 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thompson Concrete Foundations Ltd. 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thompson Concrete Foundations Ltd. - Ohio Division 63 FTE
NAT-TCR Prairie Farms Dairy - Mindoro 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR PA012EXM 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Northeast Oregon Housing Authority 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 2649 - Westwood 9.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 5020144 - DGS Richards Blvd Office Complex 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tidewater Logistics LLC 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town Village Sterling Heights 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority Haysi Facility 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.