Skilled nursing facilities · Ohio

Arbors at Marietta

Marietta, OH · ~136 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arbors at Marietta runs at 232% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Arbors at Marietta: 15.1 TCR = 232% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arbors at Marietta safety composite

Arbors at Marietta scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2024

Arbors at Marietta injury rate improved

Arbors at Marietta's TCR fell 2.4 from 8.4 in 2016 to 6.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 65.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.4 · 2017=7.5 · 2018=10.2 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=31.6 · 2021=46.3 · 2022=65.4 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=6.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Marietta, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 15.1 · 232% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #934/1074
  • PHOTO Briarfield at Ashley…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 68 inj
  • SIZE ~136 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Briarfield at Ashley Circle (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Arbors at Marietta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arbors at Marietta averages 15.1 TCR (232% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arbors at Marietta TCR series: 2016=8.4 · 2017=7.5 · 2018=10.2 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=31.6 · 2021=46.3 · 2022=65.4 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=6 · BLS 6.5

Where Arbors at Marietta falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #934 safest of 1074 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Ohio.

Arbors at Marietta (136 employees, TCR 15.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Arbors at Marietta
Arbors at Marietta (136 employees, TCR 15.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Arbors at Marietta has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.0 4.0 6 0 0
2023 3.1 3.1 3 0 0
2022 65.4 65.4 10 49 0
2021 46.3 45.4 8 43 0
2020 31.6 31.6 3 26 0
2019 7.5 0.8 9 0 0
2018 10.2 4.6 11 0 0
2017 7.5 4.7 8 0 0
2016 8.4 6.7 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · OH · Marietta

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 105 employers in Marietta, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Briarfield at Ashley Circle 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Russellville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Manor 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Consulate Health Care of Tallahassee 15.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE A. A. Boos & Sons, Inc. 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE Division #10 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Smith & Oby Company 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE NVR Building Products (OHP) 136 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health System Main Campus 1,787 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkersbug 1,686 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thermo Fisher Scientific Marietta, OH (LPD) 566 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thermo Fisher Scientific (Asheville), LLC 561 FTE
NAT-TCR Lincoln District Maint. 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Nefab Packaging North central LLC 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Otsego 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Church of God Home 15.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE WV-Crossings East LLC 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE J & D Tube Benders, Inc 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indianapolis Distribution Ctr 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rennes Health & Rehab Center - West 136 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.