Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Wisconsin

Arborview Court

Wisconsin Rapids, WI · ~45 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arborview Court runs at 283% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Arborview Court: 10.8 TCR = 283% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arborview Court safety composite

Arborview Court scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2017→2024

Arborview Court injury rate improved

Arborview Court's TCR fell 2.7 from 5.3 in 2017 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 27.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.3 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=24.0 · 2020=27.3 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Wisconsin Rapids, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.8 · 283% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #231/273
  • PHOTO La Siena
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: La Siena (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Arborview Court in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arborview Court averages 10.8 TCR (283% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arborview Court TCR series: 2017=5.3 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=24 · 2020=27.3 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Arborview Court falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #231 safest of 273 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

Arborview Court (45 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Arborview Court
Arborview Court (45 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Arborview Court has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2023 5.3 2.7 2 0 0
2022 5.3 0.0 2 0 0
2020 27.3 18.2 9 0 0
2019 24.0 8.0 9 0 0
2018 5.3 5.3 2 0 0
2017 5.3 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WI · Wisconsin Rapids

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 70 employers in Wisconsin Rapids, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR La Siena 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Bristal At East Meadow 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MBK - The Bellettini 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bayside Senior Living 10.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Denmark Dairy LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plover #205 Farms 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Babcock, WI Receiving Station 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wisconsin Rapids Mill 962 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aspirus Riverview Hospital & Clinics, Inc. 631 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aspirus Riverview Hospital622 593 FTE
CITY-NEAR McCain Foods Plant #8 525 FTE
NAT-TCR S & R Farm Labor Contractor 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR SCG 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Shakopee Lumber Yard 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR La Siena 10.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coast Counties Peterbilt - San Jose 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE S05723 - Port Huron Hauling 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE S08859 - WM Recycling Miami MRF 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE C & E Services, Inc. 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.