Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Wisconsin

Arborwood Lodge

Wisconsin Rapids, WI · ~26 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arborwood Lodge runs at 258% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Arborwood Lodge: 9.8 TCR = 258% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arborwood Lodge safety composite

Arborwood Lodge scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Arborwood Lodge: 0.0 → 15.8 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 25.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.54× in 2024

Arborwood Lodge's TCR rose 15.8 from 0.0 in 2017 to 15.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 25.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Wisconsin Rapids, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 258% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #222/273
  • PHOTO Residence at Five Co…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Residence at Five Corners (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Arborwood Lodge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arborwood Lodge averages 9.8 TCR (258% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arborwood Lodge TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=25.9 · 2020=5.3 · 2022=11.2 · 2023=10.6 · 2024=15.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Arborwood Lodge falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #222 safest of 273 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

Arborwood Lodge (26 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Arborwood Lodge
Arborwood Lodge (26 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Arborwood Lodge has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.8 5.3 3 0 0
2023 10.6 0.0 2 0 0
2022 11.2 0.0 2 0 0
2020 5.3 5.3 1 0 0
2019 25.9 10.4 5 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WI · Wisconsin Rapids

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 70 employers in Wisconsin Rapids, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Residence at Five Corners 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Hamilton Wolfe 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR LivGenerations Ahwatukee 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63135 9.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE WORZELLA & SONS, INC. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spring Grove Dairy 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ross Soil Service LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE ABS 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wisconsin Rapids Mill 962 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aspirus Riverview Hospital & Clinics, Inc. 631 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aspirus Riverview Hospital622 593 FTE
CITY-NEAR McCain Foods Plant #8 525 FTE
NAT-TCR Bauer Specialty Commercial Services 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR San Bernardino Family Y 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 412 Walbridge Road 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Landscape (0704) 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dragon Rigs LTD, Odessa TX Facility 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE S09014 - McCourtney Road Transfer Station 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03965 - Shenandoah Valley Hauling 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Albert Lea Plant 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.