Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability · New Mexico

ARCA InterCare Service Trumbull

Albuquerque, NM · ~21 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ARCA InterCare Service Trumbull runs at 303% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade F.

ARCA InterCare Service Trumbull: 11.5 TCR = 303% of Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ARCA InterCare Service Trumbull safety composite

ARCA InterCare Service Trumbull scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.9

2021→2024

ARCA InterCare Service Trumbull injury rate improved

ARCA InterCare Service Trumbull's TCR fell 7.9 from 15.5 in 2021 to 7.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 53.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=15.5 · 2022=53.5 · 2024=7.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Albuquerque, NM ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.5 · 303% of ind

  • DART 7.6 DART
  • RANK #10/16
  • PHOTO Work Unlimited Depar…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Work Unlimited Department 13 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Mexico employers → · Look up another →

ARCA InterCare Service Trumbull in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ARCA InterCare Service Trumbull averages 11.5 TCR (303% of the Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ARCA InterCare Service Trumbull TCR series: 2021=15.5 · 2022=53.5 · 2024=7.6 · BLS 3.8

Where ARCA InterCare Service Trumbull falls in its industry

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Mexico alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 16 Group homes, intellectual and employers in New Mexico.

ARCA InterCare Service Trumbull (21 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate ARCA InterCare Service Trumbull
ARCA InterCare Service Trumbull (21 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

ARCA InterCare Service Trumbull has fewer employees than the Group homes, intellectual and developmen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.6 7.6 1 0 0
2022 53.5 53.5 1 8 0
2021 15.5 15.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · NM · Albuquerque

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,241 rated employers in New Mexico with headcount on file · 944 employers in Albuquerque, NM · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Work Unlimited Department 13 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Delaney Ave 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Periska #3 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR One Vision 11.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE FacilityBUILD, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Town of Taos Facilities Dept. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sychar, LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooling Tower Maintenance & Repair 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR NM-01 4,429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Presbyterian Hospital 4,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper Administrative Center 3,531 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ABQ1 1,917 FTE
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Express Modesto 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Waters of Bristol 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Wisconsin Humane Society - Green Bay 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Wadena County Transit Department 11.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ready Seafood - Sorrento 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regional Plaza - C 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Canoe Brook BA, LLC 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meridian Construction Corporation 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.