Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Kentucky

Arcadia Sr Living Bowling Green

Bowling Green, KY · ~48 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arcadia Sr Living Bowling Green runs at 81% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Arcadia Sr Living Bowling Green: 3.1 TCR = 81% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arcadia Sr Living Bowling Green safety composite

Arcadia Sr Living Bowling Green scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.1

2022→2023

Arcadia Sr Living Bowling Green injury rate improved

Arcadia Sr Living Bowling Green's TCR fell 6.1 from 6.1 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=6.1 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Bowling Green, KY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 81% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/64
  • PHOTO Brandywine Living at…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brandywine Living at Haverford Estates (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Arcadia Sr Living Bowling Green in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arcadia Sr Living Bowling Green averages 3.1 TCR (81% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arcadia Sr Living Bowling Green TCR series: 2022=6.1 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Arcadia Sr Living Bowling Green falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 64 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Kentucky.

Arcadia Sr Living Bowling Green (48 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Arcadia Sr Living Bowling Green
Arcadia Sr Living Bowling Green (48 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Arcadia Sr Living Bowling Green has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.1 6.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · KY · Bowling Green

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 331 employers in Bowling Green, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brandywine Living at Haverford Estates 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage at Legacy 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5983 - Pinewood Hills 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Senior Living Corsicana 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Peterson Farms 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cane Run Station 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bri-Den Roofing 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cunningham Door & Window 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Kentucky University-Bowling Green 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Medical Center at Bowling Green 1,872 FTE
CITY-NEAR Magna Bowling Green Metalforming 1,441 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bowling Green Metalforming 1,344 FTE
NAT-TCR Attwood Lowell 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ecoservices LLC 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Office 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Metro- Exposition Center 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chandler's Square 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sun City Cherrington 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pregis-Garland 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - HPH1 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.