Strip, galvanized iron or steel, made in iron and steel mills · Ohio

ArcelorMittal Columbus

Columbus, OH · ~131 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ArcelorMittal Columbus runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Strip, galvanized iron or steel, made in iron and steel mills workplace, earning a grade B.

ArcelorMittal Columbus: 2.5 TCR = 76% of Strip, galvanized iron or steel, made in iron and steel mills BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ArcelorMittal Columbus safety composite

ArcelorMittal Columbus scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ArcelorMittal Columbus: 1.2 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 3.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.49× in 2019

ArcelorMittal Columbus's TCR rose 1.3 from 1.2 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331110 · Columbus, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 76% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #28/53
  • PHOTO Jackson TN. Mill
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~131 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jackson TN. Mill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

ArcelorMittal Columbus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ArcelorMittal Columbus averages 2.5 TCR (76% of the Strip, galvanized iron or steel, made in iron and steel mills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ArcelorMittal Columbus TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where ArcelorMittal Columbus falls in its industry

416 Strip, galvanized iron or stee establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 53 Strip, galvanized iron or stee employers in Ohio.

ArcelorMittal Columbus (131 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate ArcelorMittal Columbus
ArcelorMittal Columbus (131 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7

ArcelorMittal Columbus has fewer employees than the Strip, galvanized iron or steel, made in median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.5 1.2 2 2 0
2018 2.4 1.2 4 0 0
2017 3.9 0.6 7 0 0
2016 1.2 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331110 · OH · Columbus

416 Strip, galvanized iron or steel, made in iron and steel mills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,500 employers in Columbus, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jackson TN. Mill 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Levy Environmental Services Company dba Levy Gallatin Mill Service 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gerdau Midlothian 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ArcelorMittal Conshohocken (EIN 20-0653500) 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Industrial First, Inc. 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Romanoff Electric Residential, LLC - Columbus 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hiland Wood Products Inc. 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allergan Sales 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital 13,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital Main Campus 10,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Methodist Hospital 9,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH1 5,057 FTE
NAT-TCR Manufacture 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR DASAN Zhone Solutions, Inc. Seminole 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR George's Broadway Hatchery 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-Swy 0029 2275 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 392 - Severna Park 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE 245 - Eau Claire 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE 156 - Newport News 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE 153 - Paducah 131 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.