Bolts, metal, manufacturing · California

Arconic Global Fasteners & Rings, INC. Fullerton

Fullerton, CA · ~590 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arconic Global Fasteners & Rings, INC. Fullerton runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Bolts, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Arconic Global Fasteners & Rings, INC. Fullerton: 1.8 TCR = 54% of Bolts, metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arconic Global Fasteners & Rings, INC. Fullerton safety composite

Arconic Global Fasteners & Rings, INC. Fullerton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2017→2018

Arconic Global Fasteners & Rings, INC. Fullerton injury rate improved

Arconic Global Fasteners & Rings, INC. Fullerton's TCR fell 1.1 from 2.3 in 2017 to 1.2 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.3 · 2018=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332722 · Fullerton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 54% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #16/42
  • PHOTO Itw Buildex- Roselle
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~590 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Itw Buildex- Roselle (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Arconic Global Fasteners & Rings, INC. Fullerton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arconic Global Fasteners & Rings, INC. Fullerton averages 1.8 TCR (54% of the Bolts, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arconic Global Fasteners & Rings, INC. Fullerton TCR series: 2017=2.3 · 2018=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Arconic Global Fasteners & Rings, INC. Fullerton falls in its industry

335 Bolts, metal, manufacturing establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 42 Bolts, metal, manufacturing employers in California.

Arconic Global Fasteners & Rings, INC. Fullerton (590 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Arconic Global Fasteners & Rings, INC. Fullerton
Arconic Global Fasteners & Rings, INC. Fullerton (590 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Arconic Global Fasteners & Rings, INC. Fullerton has more employees than the Bolts, metal, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.2 0.1 3 6 0
2017 2.3 1.3 10 6 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332722 · CA · Fullerton

335 Bolts, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 167 employers in Fullerton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Itw Buildex- Roselle 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acument Global Technologies 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acument 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR LISI Aerospace 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Liberty Packing Company 590 FTE
STATE-SIZE SAN-GROUND OPS 590 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Diego Unified Port District 590 FTE
STATE-SIZE Preschool Services 590 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA692 ST JUDE MEDICAL CENTER HR 2,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR SASCO 705 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Fullerton 692 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fullerton / Orange 636 FTE
NAT-TCR The Robbins Company Conveyor Division 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Edwards Wood Products - Transportation 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bemis North America - Oshkosh North 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hydro - Portland Coatings 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sterling Boiler & Mechanical, LLC 590 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amzl : Dew8 590 FTE
NAT-SIZE Loram Fleet/Operations 590 FTE
NAT-SIZE Black Hills Corp. Headquarters (SD006) 590 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.