Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly · Pennsylvania

Arden Courts of Old Orchard

Easton, PA · ~38 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arden Courts of Old Orchard runs at 257% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly workplace, earning a grade F.

Arden Courts of Old Orchard: 9.8 TCR = 257% of Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arden Courts of Old Orchard safety composite

Arden Courts of Old Orchard scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.7

2016→2024

Arden Courts of Old Orchard injury rate improved

Arden Courts of Old Orchard's TCR fell 13.7 from 21.9 in 2016 to 8.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 21.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=21.9 · 2017=6.7 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=12.2 · 2022=12.9 · 2024=8.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Easton, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 257% of ind

  • DART 8.3 DART
  • RANK #174/257
  • PHOTO Heritage Woods of Fr…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heritage Woods of Freeport (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Arden Courts of Old Orchard in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arden Courts of Old Orchard averages 9.8 TCR (257% of the Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arden Courts of Old Orchard TCR series: 2016=21.9 · 2017=6.7 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=12.2 · 2022=12.9 · 2024=8.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Arden Courts of Old Orchard falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted Living Facilities for establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #174 safest of 257 Assisted Living Facilities for employers in Pennsylvania.

Arden Courts of Old Orchard (38 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Arden Courts of Old Orchard
Arden Courts of Old Orchard (38 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Arden Courts of Old Orchard has fewer employees than the Assisted Living Facilities for the Elder median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.3 8.3 4 0 0
2022 12.9 8.6 2 1 0
2021 12.2 12.2 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.4 6.4 2 0 0
2017 6.7 3.3 2 0 0
2016 21.9 17.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Easton

4,127 Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 182 employers in Easton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heritage Woods of Freeport 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Williams Place 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crown Pointe 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Chelsea at Manalapan 9.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kaolin Mushroom Farms - M&J Facility 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dairy 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc - Elizabethtown 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Risser's Poultry Handling Services, LLC 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ABE4 1,394 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAFAYETTE COLLEGE 1,338 FTE
CITY-NEAR Victaulic - Forks 1,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Radial - Easton 2 1,181 FTE
NAT-TCR Hajoca 740 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Brownstown 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Gordon Logistics 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Amberwood Manor 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bolder Industries Maryville, LLC 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pearce Foundry 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE D K Plastics 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Turf Tamers 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.