Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly · Pennsylvania

Arden Courts of Warminster

Hatboro, PA · ~44 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arden Courts of Warminster runs at 342% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly workplace, earning a grade F.

Arden Courts of Warminster: 13.0 TCR = 342% of Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arden Courts of Warminster safety composite

Arden Courts of Warminster scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2017→2024

Arden Courts of Warminster injury rate improved

Arden Courts of Warminster's TCR fell 5.8 from 21.7 in 2017 to 15.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 21.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=21.7 · 2018=15.9 · 2021=11.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2024=15.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Hatboro, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.0 · 342% of ind

  • DART 9.6 DART
  • RANK #215/257
  • PHOTO Legend of Lancaster
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Legend of Lancaster (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Arden Courts of Warminster in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arden Courts of Warminster averages 13.0 TCR (342% of the Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arden Courts of Warminster TCR series: 2017=21.7 · 2018=15.9 · 2021=11.4 · 2022=0 · 2024=15.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Arden Courts of Warminster falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted Living Facilities for establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #215 safest of 257 Assisted Living Facilities for employers in Pennsylvania.

Arden Courts of Warminster (44 employees, TCR 13.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Arden Courts of Warminster
Arden Courts of Warminster (44 employees, TCR 13.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Arden Courts of Warminster has fewer employees than the Assisted Living Facilities for the Elder median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.9 9.6 5 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 11.4 7.6 3 0 0
2018 15.9 10.6 6 0 0
2017 21.7 13.6 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Hatboro

4,127 Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 32 employers in Hatboro, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Legend of Lancaster 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Landing of O'Fallon 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frisco Memory Care, LLC 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silverado Brookfield - 241 13.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Milton Grove Egg 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kreider Farms - Donegal Egg 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE WESSC West Shore Service Center 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUNSC Sunbury Service Center 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACME Box Company 270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Azzur Consulting, LLC 240 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acme Corrugated Box Co., Inc. 238 FTE
CITY-NEAR Power Back Willow Grove 157 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale College Square 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 739 Fre26 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR New Souther Wholesale #95 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Denton DC #086 13.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Thunderstone LLC 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Primrose of Tyler 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE RED Technologies, LLC 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peach Tree Place 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.