Recreational equipment and supplies (except vehicles) merchant wholesalers · Wisconsin

Ardisam, Inc.

Cumberland, WI · ~137 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ardisam, Inc. runs at 175% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Recreational equipment and supplies (except vehicles) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Ardisam, Inc.: 3.9 TCR = 175% of Recreational equipment and supplies (except vehicles) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ardisam, Inc. safety composite

Ardisam, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2018→2024

Ardisam, Inc. injury rate improved

Ardisam, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.3 from 5.9 in 2018 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.9 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423910 · Cumberland, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.9 · 175% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #5/8
  • PHOTO Dan Wesson Firearms
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~137 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dan Wesson Firearms (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Ardisam, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ardisam, Inc. averages 3.9 TCR (175% of the Recreational equipment and supplies (except vehicles) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ardisam, Inc. TCR series: 2018=5.9 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 2.2

Where Ardisam, Inc. falls in its industry

176 Recreational equipment and sup establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 8 Recreational equipment and sup employers in Wisconsin.

Ardisam, Inc. (137 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Ardisam, Inc.
Ardisam, Inc. (137 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Ardisam, Inc. has more employees than the Recreational equipment and supplies (exc median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 0.8 2 0 0
2023 4.3 2.1 4 2 0
2022 5.6 0.0 5 3 0
2021 1.5 0.0 1 1 0
2020 2.6 0.9 2 1 0
2019 5.4 2.2 4 1 0
2018 5.9 1.2 2 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423910 · WI · Cumberland

176 Recreational equipment and supplies (except vehicles) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 10 employers in Cumberland, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dan Wesson Firearms 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4829-10357 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAP Barbell Inc 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sports Specialists of Milwaukee, Inc. 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Poblocki Paving Corp. 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seneca Foods Corporation - Cambria East 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meister Cheese Company LLC 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE Germantown Container 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR Seneca Foods Corporation - Cumberland 209 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cumberland Healthcare-Hospital 209 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cumberland 180 FTE
CITY-NEAR Care and Rehab- Cumberland 72 FTE
NAT-TCR Builders Supply Company 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Agrana Fruit US, Inc. Centerville 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR S05103 - Apex Waste Services, Inc 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Worthen Industries Grand Rapids 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE BW Mitchum Trucking 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sealed Air Corporation 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE NA-US-MN-Brooklyn Park-Office 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE Birmingham Bhm 137 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.