Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Texas

Aries Buildings Systems

Troy, TX · ~161 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aries Buildings Systems runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade C.

Aries Buildings Systems: 2.9 TCR = 100% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aries Buildings Systems safety composite

Aries Buildings Systems scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2017→2021

Aries Buildings Systems injury rate improved

Aries Buildings Systems's TCR fell 1.9 from 4.1 in 2017 to 2.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.1 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Troy, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 100% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #237/327
  • PHOTO Genesee Construction…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~161 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Genesee Construction Service, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Aries Buildings Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aries Buildings Systems averages 2.9 TCR (100% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aries Buildings Systems TCR series: 2017=4.1 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=2.1 · BLS 2.9

Where Aries Buildings Systems falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #237 safest of 327 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Texas.

Aries Buildings Systems (161 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Aries Buildings Systems
Aries Buildings Systems (161 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Aries Buildings Systems has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.1 0.7 3 0 0
2020 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2019 2.5 2.5 2 2 0
2018 4.9 3.5 7 0 0
2017 4.1 4.1 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · TX · Troy

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 7 employers in Troy, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Genesee Construction Service, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hawaii Office 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR WORTH CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR R.A. Roth Construction & Son, Inc. 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wildcat Oil Tools 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE Venegas Engineering Management & Construction, Inc. 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE TransCore - T0574 - Houston CSC 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE 560 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anderton Castings LLC 251 FTE
CITY-NEAR Big Elm 188 FTE
CITY-NEAR Permian Tank & Manufacturing, Inc. - Troy 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lide Industries, LLC - Troy 37 FTE
NAT-TCR Lincoln Panevino 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR NAPA Main Store 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Sisters Hosp of Buffalo-Hskpg 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at St. Luke'S Des Peres Hospital 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE General Cable Industries, LLC 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Star Cases LLC dba Zero Manufacturing 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE 18 - Avon 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Detroit Northwest 161 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.