All-terrain vehicles (ATVs) merchant wholesalers · Arizona

Arizona Office Technologies - Phoenix

Phoenix, AZ · ~109 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arizona Office Technologies - Phoenix runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical All-terrain vehicles (ATVs) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade B.

Arizona Office Technologies - Phoenix: 1.6 TCR = 74% of All-terrain vehicles (ATVs) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arizona Office Technologies - Phoenix safety composite

Arizona Office Technologies - Phoenix scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2016→2018

Arizona Office Technologies - Phoenix injury rate improved

Arizona Office Technologies - Phoenix's TCR fell 1.9 from 1.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.0 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=3.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423110 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 74% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/22
  • PHOTO Sioux City Truck Sal…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sioux City Truck Sales, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Arizona Office Technologies - Phoenix in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arizona Office Technologies - Phoenix averages 1.6 TCR (74% of the All-terrain vehicles (ATVs) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arizona Office Technologies - Phoenix TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=3 · 2018=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Arizona Office Technologies - Phoenix falls in its industry

1,333 All-terrain vehicles (ATVs) me establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 22 All-terrain vehicles (ATVs) me employers in Arizona.

Arizona Office Technologies - Phoenix (109 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Arizona Office Technologies - Phoenix
Arizona Office Technologies - Phoenix (109 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Arizona Office Technologies - Phoenix has more employees than the All-terrain vehicles (ATVs) merchant who median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.0 3.0 3 0 0
2016 1.9 1.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423110 · AZ · Phoenix

1,333 All-terrain vehicles (ATVs) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sioux City Truck Sales, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Premier Truck of Salt Lake City 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1008 RTC DALLAS MED. DUTY 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2410 RTC LIMA 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Civano Growers 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shamrock Farms 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kelco Contracting, LLC 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quartz 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Colgate Tennessee 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale New Bern 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Belden Tup 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Standard Utility Contractors, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harland Clarke Holdings - Florence 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Estrella Oaks Rehab and Care Center 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zeon Chemicals L. P. Kentucky Plant 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Watershed - Corporate 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.