Nursing homes · Texas

Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center

Fort Worth, TX · ~117 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center runs at 224% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade F.

Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center: 14.5 TCR = 224% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−25.2

2022→2024

Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center injury rate improved

Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center's TCR fell 25.2 from 27.1 in 2022 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 27.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=27.1 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Fort Worth, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.5 · 224% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #1013/1034
  • PHOTO Carington Park
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~117 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Carington Park (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center averages 14.5 TCR (224% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2022=27.1 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1013 safest of 1034 Nursing homes employers in Texas.

Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center (117 employees, TCR 14.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center
Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center (117 employees, TCR 14.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2022 27.1 27.1 2 22 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · TX · Fort Worth

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Carington Park 14.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR AVANTE AT LEESBURG 14.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highlands of Stamps 14.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medilodge of Wyoming 14.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Genesis Energy Offshore Pipeline 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grayson-Collin Electric Cooper 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morrow Renewables 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE PICCo -06300241 Dow Gulfstream CRW 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Rosebud Concrete Inc. 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant 4 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Specialty Bakers LLC 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Police Administration 14.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wheaton Van Lines, Inc 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Firstar Fiber Inc 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tulsa Ok - 824 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE P&H Mfg Co 117 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.