Garage doors, metal, manufacturing · New Jersey

Arm-R-Lite Door Manufacturing Operations

Piscataway, NJ · ~22 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arm-R-Lite Door Manufacturing Operations runs at 153% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Garage doors, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Arm-R-Lite Door Manufacturing Operations: 5.1 TCR = 153% of Garage doors, metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arm-R-Lite Door Manufacturing Operations safety composite

Arm-R-Lite Door Manufacturing Operations scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Arm-R-Lite Door Manufacturing Operations held a steady TCR band

Arm-R-Lite Door Manufacturing Operations's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 15.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2022=15.2 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332321 · Piscataway, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 153% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/11
  • PHOTO CornellCookson
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CornellCookson (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Arm-R-Lite Door Manufacturing Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arm-R-Lite Door Manufacturing Operations averages 5.1 TCR (153% of the Garage doors, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arm-R-Lite Door Manufacturing Operations TCR series: 2017=0 · 2022=15.2 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Arm-R-Lite Door Manufacturing Operations falls in its industry

515 Garage doors, metal, manufactu establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 11 Garage doors, metal, manufactu employers in New Jersey.

Arm-R-Lite Door Manufacturing Operations (22 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Arm-R-Lite Door Manufacturing Operations
Arm-R-Lite Door Manufacturing Operations (22 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Arm-R-Lite Door Manufacturing Operations has fewer employees than the Garage doors, metal, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 15.2 15.2 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332321 · NJ · Piscataway

515 Garage doors, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 124 employers in Piscataway, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CornellCookson 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arcadia Products, LLC - Tucson 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Masonite-Dickson 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PGT Industries 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE America's Grow-A-Row Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES : Red Oak Power 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woodbridge Energy Center 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eagle Point Power Generation, LLC 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Technology Center, Colgate - Palmolive 1,042 FTE
CITY-NEAR Colgate-Palmolive Global Technology Center 978 FTE
CITY-NEAR Colgate-Palmolive Company 978 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ferraro Foods 733 FTE
NAT-TCR M2 Santa Fe Tenant LLC 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR USM Store #579 (United) 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR MCRT Odessa 2 Tenant LLC 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR AMC of Wisconsin Inc 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amery Fitness & Rehab 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sonesta ES Suites Charlotte 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE 204 - North Georgia Hauling 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unit #0270 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.