Bonded warehousing, general merchandise · Texas

Army Field Support Battalion - Fort Hood

Fort Hood, TX · ~361 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Army Field Support Battalion - Fort Hood runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bonded warehousing, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade A.

Army Field Support Battalion - Fort Hood: 0.8 TCR = 14% of Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Army Field Support Battalion - Fort Hood safety composite

Army Field Support Battalion - Fort Hood scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2021→2023

Army Field Support Battalion - Fort Hood injury rate improved

Army Field Support Battalion - Fort Hood's TCR fell 0.5 from 1.1 in 2021 to 0.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=1.1 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Fort Hood, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #75/846
  • PHOTO Memphis - Citation
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~361 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Memphis - Citation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Army Field Support Battalion - Fort Hood in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Army Field Support Battalion - Fort Hood averages 0.8 TCR (14% of the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Army Field Support Battalion - Fort Hood TCR series: 2021=1.1 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.5 · BLS 5.8

Where Army Field Support Battalion - Fort Hood falls in its industry

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general me establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #75 safest of 846 Bonded warehousing, general me employers in Texas.

Army Field Support Battalion - Fort Hood (361 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Army Field Support Battalion - Fort Hood
Army Field Support Battalion - Fort Hood (361 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Army Field Support Battalion - Fort Hood has more employees than the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.5 0.3 2 0 0
2022 0.8 0.5 3 0 0
2021 1.1 0.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · TX · Fort Hood

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 26 employers in Fort Hood, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Memphis - Citation 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lennox Residential Distribution 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort Mill DC (T&O, Tools) 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR IE Distribution Services, LLC. 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Buckhead Meat and Seafood of Houston 361 FTE
STATE-SIZE NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO - Houston Service & Repair Facility 361 FTE
STATE-SIZE 11DA060 MED-SURG DALLAS-GRAPEVINE 361 FTE
STATE-SIZE USM Store #679 (Market Street) 361 FTE
CITY-NEAR DI - RASM-W Ft Hood 204 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Cavazos 191 FTE
CITY-NEAR FORT HOOD 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR D&Z MRO - Fort Hood, TX 89 FTE
NAT-TCR SpringHill Suites Navarre Beach 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue and Gold Fleet - Central Bay 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Natick Store 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR IE Distribution Services, LLC. 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Anning-Johnson Company Southern California 361 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lacey Manufacturing Company LLC 361 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wyandot, INC 361 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 361 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.