Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Indiana

Arpip Deliver, LLC

South Bend, IN · ~64 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arpip Deliver, LLC runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade A.

Arpip Deliver, LLC: 3.2 TCR = 50% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arpip Deliver, LLC safety composite

Arpip Deliver, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.4

2022→2023

Arpip Deliver, LLC injury rate improved

Arpip Deliver, LLC's TCR fell 6.4 from 6.4 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=6.4 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · South Bend, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 3.2 · 50% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/139
  • PHOTO FLCHI - CHIPLEY
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FLCHI - CHIPLEY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Arpip Deliver, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arpip Deliver, LLC averages 3.2 TCR (50% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arpip Deliver, LLC TCR series: 2022=6.4 · 2023=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Arpip Deliver, LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 139 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Indiana.

Arpip Deliver, LLC (64 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Arpip Deliver, LLC
Arpip Deliver, LLC (64 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Arpip Deliver, LLC has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.4 4.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · IN · South Bend

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 318 employers in South Bend, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FLCHI - CHIPLEY 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR LAALE - ALEXANDRIA 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR WASAU - SEATTLE AUTO SHOP 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 17831 ENGLEWOOD DRIVE 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corporate Office 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phend & Brown, Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Division 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cincinnati 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital South Bend 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph County 1,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fourwinds Casino South Bend 1,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR Honeywell IN08 810 FTE
NAT-TCR Boys and Girls Club of the Valley 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Allen Butler Construction Inc 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Select Specialty Hospital - Danville, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR ATOZ Tech, LLC - Selma 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mountainside Fitness Centers of Mesa LLC 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Napa Hawaii Dc 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wilmette Affiliate, LLC 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Miller-Thomas-Gyekis INC. 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.