Fire and flood restoration, multifamily building, general contractors · North Dakota

Arrow Cleaning and Restoration Inc.

Bisamarck, ND · ~63 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arrow Cleaning and Restoration Inc. runs at 305% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fire and flood restoration, multifamily building, general contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Arrow Cleaning and Restoration Inc.: 11.6 TCR = 305% of Fire and flood restoration, multifamily building, general contractors BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arrow Cleaning and Restoration Inc. safety composite

Arrow Cleaning and Restoration Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Arrow Cleaning and Restoration Inc.: 10.2 → 11.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 13.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.19× in 2024

Arrow Cleaning and Restoration Inc.'s TCR rose 1.0 from 10.2 in 2022 to 11.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 13.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236118 · Bisamarck, ND ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.6 · 305% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO Guyou Construction I…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Guyou Construction Inc_Indiana (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Arrow Cleaning and Restoration Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arrow Cleaning and Restoration Inc. averages 11.6 TCR (305% of the Fire and flood restoration, multifamily building, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arrow Cleaning and Restoration Inc. TCR series: 2022=10.2 · 2023=13.3 · 2024=11.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Arrow Cleaning and Restoration Inc. falls in its industry

698 Fire and flood restoration, mu establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Fire and flood restoration, mu employers in North Dakota.

Arrow Cleaning and Restoration Inc. (63 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Arrow Cleaning and Restoration Inc.
Arrow Cleaning and Restoration Inc. (63 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Arrow Cleaning and Restoration Inc. has more employees than the Fire and flood restoration, multifamily median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.3 2.3 5 0 0
2023 13.3 2.2 6 0 0
2022 10.2 2.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236118 · ND · Bisamarck

698 Fire and flood restoration, multifamily building, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Guyou Construction Inc_Indiana 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Fire & Water Repair 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR D & A Enterprises Inc. 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Champion Window Company of Macon, LLC 11.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Watford City Plant 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Williston Brigade Energy Services 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fargo Service Center 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roers Construction Company 63 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 4596 - CQ 34th Street No 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR AF Wendling 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Jimmy John's 1425 Ogden 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sch USA LLC 11.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Battenfeld Grease & Oil Corp of New York 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orange PKG Favoriti 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Arbors at Stoneham 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lasco San Antonio 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.