Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing · Florida

Arrow Sheet Metal Works, Inc.

Tampa, FL · ~24 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arrow Sheet Metal Works, Inc. runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Arrow Sheet Metal Works, Inc.: 2.8 TCR = 84% of Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arrow Sheet Metal Works, Inc. safety composite

Arrow Sheet Metal Works, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Arrow Sheet Metal Works, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Arrow Sheet Metal Works, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 9.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=9.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Tampa, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 84% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/43
  • PHOTO ECO Duct Incorporated
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ECO Duct Incorporated (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Arrow Sheet Metal Works, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arrow Sheet Metal Works, Inc. averages 2.8 TCR (84% of the Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arrow Sheet Metal Works, Inc. TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=9.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Arrow Sheet Metal Works, Inc. falls in its industry

1,158 Air cowls, sheet metal (except establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 43 Air cowls, sheet metal (except employers in Florida.

Arrow Sheet Metal Works, Inc. (24 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Arrow Sheet Metal Works, Inc.
Arrow Sheet Metal Works, Inc. (24 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Arrow Sheet Metal Works, Inc. has fewer employees than the Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 9.8 9.8 2 0 0
2022 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2021 4.7 4.7 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · FL · Tampa

1,158 Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ECO Duct Incorporated 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holladay St. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TROY IL 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CEMCO- Ft. Worth 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Stone Henge 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trulieve Calumet 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harplyn Inc 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE JW Turf Farms, Inc. 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR Radial Grinding & Mfg. Corp. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Scrap It Everett 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Dyno Nobel Simsbury, CT 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Profire LLC 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 6200 Phoenix Arizona 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brittain Electric, Inc. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Material Sampling Technologies 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Custom Cabinets 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.