Screen printing apparel and textile products (e.g. caps, napkins, placemats, T-shirts, towels) (except grey goods) · Virginia

ArtFX Suffolk

Suffolk, VA · ~54 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ArtFX Suffolk runs at 210% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Screen printing apparel and textile products (e.g. caps, napkins, placemats, T-shirts, towels) (except grey goods) workplace, earning a grade F.

ArtFX Suffolk: 6.9 TCR = 210% of Screen printing apparel and textile products (e.g. caps, napkins, placemats, T-shirts, towels) (except grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ArtFX Suffolk safety composite

ArtFX Suffolk scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ArtFX Suffolk: 5.8 → 13.0 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 13.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.81× in 2019

ArtFX Suffolk's TCR rose 7.2 from 5.8 in 2017 to 13.0 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323113 · Suffolk, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 210% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Red Wing, MN
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Red Wing, MN (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

ArtFX Suffolk in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ArtFX Suffolk averages 6.9 TCR (210% of the Screen printing apparel and textile products (e.g. caps, napkins, placemats, T-shirts, towels) (except grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ArtFX Suffolk TCR series: 2017=5.8 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=13 · BLS 3.3

Where ArtFX Suffolk falls in its industry

200 Screen printing apparel and te establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Screen printing apparel and te employers in Virginia.

ArtFX Suffolk (54 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate ArtFX Suffolk
ArtFX Suffolk (54 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.7

ArtFX Suffolk has fewer employees than the Screen printing apparel and textile prod median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 13.0 5.6 6 1 0
2018 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2017 5.8 4.4 2 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323113 · VA · Suffolk

200 Screen printing apparel and textile products (e.g. caps, napkins, placemats, T-shirts, towels) (except grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 161 employers in Suffolk, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Red Wing, MN 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transfer Express (Arizona) 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metric 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Padrino Promotions 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harrisonburg Headquarters 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE George's Virginia Grow Out 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Harrisonburg Public Utilities (Operations) 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlantic Builders Office 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ORF3 3,196 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3841 - UDC-Suffolk 1,700 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3841 - Suffolk UDC 1,478 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sentara Obici Hospital 1,384 FTE
NAT-TCR SD,SIOUX FALLS - Maverick - Other Support Activities for Air Transportation 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Dallas - Fort Worth (GH) 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Shawnee Christian Village 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Interstate Blood and Plasma - Wilkes-Barre, PA 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Progress Ag 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kw International(Tx) 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE 018 ABC Supply Co., Inc 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE 038 ABC Supply Co., Inc 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.