Drycleaning plants (except rug cleaning plants) · New York

Arthur Copeland Cleaners

Cedarhurst, NY · ~31 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arthur Copeland Cleaners runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Drycleaning plants (except rug cleaning plants) workplace, earning a grade A.

Arthur Copeland Cleaners: 0.4 TCR = 19% of Drycleaning plants (except rug cleaning plants) BLS 2.1 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arthur Copeland Cleaners safety composite

Arthur Copeland Cleaners scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Arthur Copeland Cleaners held a steady TCR band

Arthur Copeland Cleaners's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 812320 · Cedarhurst, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/14
  • PHOTO Village Cleaners
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Village Cleaners (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Arthur Copeland Cleaners in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arthur Copeland Cleaners averages 0.4 TCR (19% of the Drycleaning plants (except rug cleaning plants) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arthur Copeland Cleaners TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Arthur Copeland Cleaners falls in its industry

193 Drycleaning plants (except rug establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 14 Drycleaning plants (except rug employers in New York.

Arthur Copeland Cleaners (31 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Arthur Copeland Cleaners
Arthur Copeland Cleaners (31 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Arthur Copeland Cleaners has fewer employees than the Drycleaning plants (except rug cleaning median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

812320 · NY · Cedarhurst

193 Drycleaning plants (except rug cleaning plants) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Village Cleaners 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lansing Cleaners, INC 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anthem 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR RKC Cleaners Corporation 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eldred Brothers / Main Farm 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fox Fruit Farms LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE ASC Kirkwood 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES : OM - New Athens 31 FTE
NAT-TCR Huntington Beach Office 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Solvay West Deptford, NJ 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR SEACOR Marine 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR New Perspective - Resource Center 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gateway Liners 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE MMA Manufacturing, Inc. dba Minute Man Anchors 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town of Oxford 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1120 Pine St 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.