Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New Jersey

Artis Senior Living of Brick

Brick, NJ · ~64 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Artis Senior Living of Brick runs at 371% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Artis Senior Living of Brick: 14.1 TCR = 371% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Artis Senior Living of Brick safety composite

Artis Senior Living of Brick scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Artis Senior Living of Brick: 8.3 → 16.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 18.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.59× in 2024

Artis Senior Living of Brick's TCR rose 8.3 from 8.3 in 2020 to 16.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 18.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Brick, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.1 · 371% of ind

  • DART 8.3 DART
  • RANK #115/125
  • PHOTO Curry House
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Curry House (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Artis Senior Living of Brick in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Artis Senior Living of Brick averages 14.1 TCR (371% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Artis Senior Living of Brick TCR series: 2020=8.3 · 2021=18.3 · 2022=10.1 · 2023=17.2 · 2024=16.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Artis Senior Living of Brick falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #115 safest of 125 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New Jersey.

Artis Senior Living of Brick (64 employees, TCR 14.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Artis Senior Living of Brick
Artis Senior Living of Brick (64 employees, TCR 14.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Artis Senior Living of Brick has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.6 8.3 5 5 0
2023 17.2 13.7 5 5 0
2022 10.1 10.1 3 2 0
2021 18.3 18.3 10 0 0
2020 8.3 2.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NJ · Brick

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 58 employers in Brick, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Curry House 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anthology of Farmington 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Brookfield AL 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MorningStar of Wheat Ridge 14.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Weeks Marine - Corporate 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Archer Exteriors, Inc - NJ 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Office 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE GE Mechanical Inc. 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ocean Medical Center 2,084 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1977 379 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1977 363 FTE
CITY-NEAR #641 Brick Shoprite 316 FTE
NAT-TCR HW Bronx 14.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Legacy at English Station 14.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Canon Lodge Care Center 14.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Luke Landscape Company 14.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Code 3 Services, LLC 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Modern Railway Systems - All Non-Office Projects 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Accessories of Florida 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE MN - Mankato 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.