Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Pennsylvania

Artman Lutheran Home

Ambler, PA · ~231 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Artman Lutheran Home runs at 521% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Artman Lutheran Home: 19.8 TCR = 521% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Artman Lutheran Home safety composite

Artman Lutheran Home scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Artman Lutheran Home held a steady TCR band

Artman Lutheran Home's TCR held near 0.3 from 6.2 in 2016 to 6.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 42.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.2 · 2017=10.2 · 2018=7.4 · 2020=27.3 · 2021=38.1 · 2022=42.9 · 2024=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Ambler, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 19.8 · 521% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #248/257
  • PHOTO Mathison Retirement …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 80 inj
  • SIZE ~231 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mathison Retirement Community (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Artman Lutheran Home in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Artman Lutheran Home averages 19.8 TCR (521% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Artman Lutheran Home TCR series: 2016=6.2 · 2017=10.2 · 2018=7.4 · 2020=27.3 · 2021=38.1 · 2022=42.9 · 2024=6.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Artman Lutheran Home falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #248 safest of 257 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

Artman Lutheran Home (231 employees, TCR 19.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Artman Lutheran Home
Artman Lutheran Home (231 employees, TCR 19.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Artman Lutheran Home has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.5 4.2 11 0 0
2022 42.9 39.8 8 60 0
2021 38.1 37.5 16 48 0
2020 27.3 25.5 6 39 0
2018 7.4 6.8 12 1 0
2017 10.2 9.0 17 0 0
2016 6.2 4.4 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Ambler

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 30 employers in Ambler, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mathison Retirement Community 19.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Generations at Oakton Arms, LLC 19.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Nicholasville 19.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Colonial Village 19.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Grid One Solutions - 196 231 FTE
STATE-SIZE Giorgio Foods Inc 231 FTE
STATE-SIZE PA-02 231 FTE
STATE-SIZE Decoration and Assembly 231 FTE
CITY-NEAR LTK ENGINEERING SERVICES 471 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-044 406 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-44 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-90170000-9017 376 FTE
NAT-TCR ABF Freight 047 19.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Viera FL 19.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Eastern Sierra Unified School District 19.8 TCR
NAT-TCR S and C Enterprises 19.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE ArcBest 400 231 FTE
NAT-SIZE Louisa Food Products, Inc 231 FTE
NAT-SIZE NOVO Health Services - Ravenna 231 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cargill Inc. 231 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.