Exhaust systems and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Indiana

Arvin Sango, Inc.

Madison, IN · ~795 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arvin Sango, Inc. runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Exhaust systems and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Arvin Sango, Inc.: 0.9 TCR = 17% of Exhaust systems and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arvin Sango, Inc. safety composite

Arvin Sango, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Arvin Sango, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Arvin Sango, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.2 from 0.9 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.9 · 2017=1.0 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Madison, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #8/66
  • PHOTO Davco Technology
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 70 inj
  • SIZE ~795 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Davco Technology (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Arvin Sango, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arvin Sango, Inc. averages 0.9 TCR (17% of the Exhaust systems and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arvin Sango, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=1 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 5.4

Where Arvin Sango, Inc. falls in its industry

772 Exhaust systems and parts, aut establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 66 Exhaust systems and parts, aut employers in Indiana.

Arvin Sango, Inc. (795 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Arvin Sango, Inc.
Arvin Sango, Inc. (795 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Arvin Sango, Inc. has more employees than the Exhaust systems and parts, automotive, t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.7 11 0 0
2023 1.2 0.9 11 0 0
2022 1.2 0.8 10 0 0
2021 0.5 0.1 4 0 0
2020 1.2 0.9 8 1 0
2019 0.5 0.3 4 0 0
2018 0.8 0.2 7 0 0
2017 1.0 0.5 8 0 0
2016 0.9 0.5 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · IN · Madison

772 Exhaust systems and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 39 employers in Madison, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Davco Technology 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aisan Industry Kentucky 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Muth Mirror Systems LLC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Autoliv Ogden Technical Center 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE LCI - 050 795 FTE
STATE-SIZE 275-NiSource-Merrillville IN-SLC 796 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marion General Hospital 796 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nucor Steel 793 FTE
CITY-NEAR Norton King's Daughters' Health Main Campus 605 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vehicle Service Group 495 FTE
CITY-NEAR Madison Precision Products 471 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grote Industries 448 FTE
NAT-TCR Ross Construction Group LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tiffin OH Soltech Owens Corning 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Aho Construction I, Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Iowa City Office 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pro Ag Harvesting Inc. 795 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lone Butte Casino 795 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jabil CVG 795 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Diego Police Department - Headquarters 795 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.