Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric · Missouri

Asbury Power Station

Asbury, MO · ~36 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Asbury Power Station runs at 193% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric workplace, earning a grade D.

Asbury Power Station: 2.3 TCR = 193% of Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Asbury Power Station safety composite

Asbury Power Station scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2016→2024

Asbury Power Station injury rate improved

Asbury Power Station's TCR fell 3.3 from 3.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Asbury, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.3 · 193% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/42
  • PHOTO Mountaineer Plant
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mountaineer Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Asbury Power Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Asbury Power Station averages 2.3 TCR (193% of the Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Asbury Power Station TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=3 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Asbury Power Station falls in its industry

846 Power generation, fossil fuel establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 42 Power generation, fossil fuel employers in Missouri.

Asbury Power Station (36 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Asbury Power Station
Asbury Power Station (36 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Asbury Power Station has fewer employees than the Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.0 0.0 0 1 0
2018 6.6 4.4 3 0 0
2017 3.4 0.0 2 0 0
2016 3.3 3.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · MO · Asbury

846 Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mountaineer Plant 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fore River Energy Center 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00630 KEYS RD OFFICE 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gillette Neil Simpson 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hazelwood, MO 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2564-Marshall, MO 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Meter Services 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sac Osage Electric Cooperative, Inc. 36 FTE
NAT-TCR Gray & Son, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodhaven Lumber & Millwork - Corp 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilo Medical Center 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Florida Division 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Continental Refining Company LLC 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Fairborn 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Franklin 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reserve Millwork LLC 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.