General warehousing and storage · Ohio

ascena Etna Distribution Center

Pataskala, OH · ~585 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ascena Etna Distribution Center runs at 125% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade D.

ascena Etna Distribution Center: 7.3 TCR = 125% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ascena Etna Distribution Center safety composite

ascena Etna Distribution Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ascena Etna Distribution Center: 4.5 → 5.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 9.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.62× in 2022

ascena Etna Distribution Center's TCR rose 1.1 from 4.5 in 2016 to 5.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 9.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Pataskala, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.3 · 125% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #497/556
  • PHOTO Amazon.com Services …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 150 inj
  • SIZE ~585 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon.com Services LLC - PCW1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

ascena Etna Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ascena Etna Distribution Center averages 7.3 TCR (125% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ascena Etna Distribution Center TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2018=9.1 · 2019=8.1 · 2021=9.1 · 2022=5.6 · BLS 5.8

Where ascena Etna Distribution Center falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #497 safest of 556 General warehousing and storag employers in Ohio.

ascena Etna Distribution Center (585 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate ascena Etna Distribution Center
ascena Etna Distribution Center (585 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

ascena Etna Distribution Center has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.6 4.5 25 0 0
2021 9.1 7.6 37 0 0
2019 8.1 5.2 34 2 0
2018 9.1 8.6 38 0 0
2016 4.5 4.0 16 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · OH · Pataskala

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 40 employers in Pataskala, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - PCW1 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Monin, Inc. Zelienople 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR KW International, Inc. (18655-Carson-CA) 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6795-86002B0199 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bath & Body Works - DC7/SB2 585 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cabinetworks Group Middlefield LLC Plant #3 586 FTE
STATE-SIZE 9799 584 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kendall House Incorporated 586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Newell Brands Home Fragrance Division 593 FTE
CITY-NEAR Illuminate USA 555 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coty Pataskala WHS 471 FTE
CITY-NEAR J&R Schugel Trucking Inc. - OH 460 FTE
NAT-TCR Quality Beverage LLC Hardeeville SC 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR AZT Technology - S 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 0621 - Estero Fl Whse 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sutter Auburn Faith Hospital (110-4001) 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE HEMPSTEAD 585 FTE
NAT-SIZE Safety Insurance 585 FTE
NAT-SIZE Binson's Medical Equipment and Supplies 585 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sheriff-Coroner Marshall Department 585 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.