Individual and family social services, multi-purpose · New Hampshire

Ascentria Community Services -Concord

Concord, NH · ~130 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ascentria Community Services -Concord runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Individual and family social services, multi-purpose workplace, earning a grade B.

Ascentria Community Services -Concord: 2.9 TCR = 75% of Individual and family social services, multi-purpose BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ascentria Community Services -Concord safety composite

Ascentria Community Services -Concord scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Ascentria Community Services -Concord held a steady TCR band

Ascentria Community Services -Concord's TCR held near 0.1 from 3.2 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.2 · 2018=2.3 · 2020=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · Concord, NH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.9 · 75% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #7/40
  • PHOTO Families First
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~130 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Families First (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Ascentria Community Services -Concord in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ascentria Community Services -Concord averages 2.9 TCR (75% of the Individual and family social services, multi-purpose BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ascentria Community Services -Concord TCR series: 2016=3.2 · 2018=2.3 · 2020=3.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Ascentria Community Services -Concord falls in its industry

990 Individual and family social s establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 40 Individual and family social s employers in New Hampshire.

Ascentria Community Services -Concord (130 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ascentria Community Services -Concord
Ascentria Community Services -Concord (130 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Ascentria Community Services -Concord has more employees than the Individual and family social services, m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2018 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2016 3.2 3.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · NH · Concord

990 Individual and family social services, multi-purpose employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 144 employers in Concord, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Families First 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sanford Office 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Hollywood Family Center 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1440 Story Avenue 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Protolabs - Rapid 15 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sig Sauer Inc (Dover) 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE NH90 AMETEK ULTRA PRECISION TECHNOLOGIES 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nashua 130 FTE
CITY-NEAR CONCORD HOSPITAL 3,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ascentria Community Care IHC 1,190 FTE
CITY-NEAR Granite State Independent Living 828 FTE
CITY-NEAR Granite VNA 438 FTE
NAT-TCR Insource Performance Solutions at Stanley Kannapolis 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR North Hollywood Family Center 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Florence (BP) 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR HAY 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mifflin Center 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE Volunteer Behavioral Health Care Services-Chattanooga/ Johnson 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Waverly 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stiles Construction 130 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.