Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors · New Jersey

ASG - East Rutherford Office

East Rutherford, NJ · ~29 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ASG - East Rutherford Office runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

ASG - East Rutherford Office: 1.3 TCR = 45% of Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ASG - East Rutherford Office safety composite

ASG - East Rutherford Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2021→2023

ASG - East Rutherford Office injury rate improved

ASG - East Rutherford Office's TCR fell 2.5 from 2.5 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=2.5 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · East Rutherford, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 45% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #29/103
  • PHOTO EC Company - Portland
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EC Company - Portland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

ASG - East Rutherford Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ASG - East Rutherford Office averages 1.3 TCR (45% of the Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ASG - East Rutherford Office TCR series: 2021=2.5 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where ASG - East Rutherford Office falls in its industry

4,550 Telecommunications equipment a establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 103 Telecommunications equipment a employers in New Jersey.

ASG - East Rutherford Office (29 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate ASG - East Rutherford Office
ASG - East Rutherford Office (29 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

ASG - East Rutherford Office has fewer employees than the Telecommunications equipment and wiring median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.5 2.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · NJ · East Rutherford

4,550 Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 39 employers in East Rutherford, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EC Company - Portland 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beacon Electric 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Travis Electrical Service, LLC 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR WINDSOR ELECTRIC CO INC 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE PRP Services Inc 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allied Construction Group Inc 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Renda Roads, Inc. 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE CMAC Communications Inc 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Jersey 1,660 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Meadowlands Sportservice, Inc. 913 FTE
CITY-NEAR MetLife Stadium 759 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ameream NJP LLC 652 FTE
NAT-TCR 8807827-Spoke Custom Products 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR ND Fairmont LLC 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Dallas Gallery 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Rope Shop 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aransas Pass Svc Ctr 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buchanan Ofc/Svc Ctr 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pt Pleasant Ofc and Svc Ctr 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE 8024 Asbury Heights 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.