Skilled nursing facilities · North Carolina

Asheboro Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

Asheboro, NC · ~96 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Asheboro Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Asheboro Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center: 3.7 TCR = 57% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Asheboro Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center safety composite

Asheboro Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Asheboro Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center: 0.0 → 7.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.6× in 2024

Asheboro Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center's TCR rose 7.4 from 0.0 in 2023 to 7.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Asheboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.7 · 57% of ind

  • DART 5.9 DART
  • RANK #124/510
  • PHOTO Galena Nursing Center
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Galena Nursing Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Asheboro Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Asheboro Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center averages 3.7 TCR (57% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Asheboro Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=7.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Asheboro Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #124 safest of 510 Skilled nursing facilities employers in North Carolina.

Asheboro Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center (96 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Asheboro Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
Asheboro Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center (96 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Asheboro Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.4 5.9 5 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NC · Asheboro

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 139 employers in Asheboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Galena Nursing Center 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magnolia Manor Retirement Center 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regency at Bluffs Park 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Concordia Village of Tampa 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Timberlake SE 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eanes Heating and Air 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Universal Blanchers, dba Olam Edible Nuts Edenton Facility 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Bern 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8020236-Energizer/Asheboro 1,287 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8020236 Energizer Asheboro 654 FTE
CITY-NEAR Technimark, LLC Plant 5 633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Technimark LLC - Plant 5 466 FTE
NAT-TCR Power Play Distributors 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ini16 - 16th Street 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Boise Parkcenter Independent Living 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Regional West Physicians Clinic 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE FV Clinics-Andover 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fort Worth Tx Distribution Center 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ky41l - Global Logistics Walton 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wvclk - Clarksburg 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.