Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) · North Carolina

Asheville Avl

Asheville, NC · ~38 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Asheville Avl runs at 204% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) workplace, earning a grade F.

Asheville Avl: 9.2 TCR = 204% of Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Asheville Avl safety composite

Asheville Avl scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.5

2016→2024

Asheville Avl injury rate improved

Asheville Avl's TCR fell 10.5 from 19.0 in 2016 to 8.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 20.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=19.0 · 2017=20.6 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=7.2 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=8.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Asheville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.2 · 204% of ind

  • DART 5.7 DART
  • RANK #155/164
  • PHOTO Hermon/Bangor Terminal
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hermon/Bangor Terminal (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Asheville Avl in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Asheville Avl averages 9.2 TCR (204% of the Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Asheville Avl TCR series: 2016=19 · 2017=20.6 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=7.2 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=8.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Asheville Avl falls in its industry

3,020 Trucking, general freight, lon establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #155 safest of 164 Trucking, general freight, lon employers in North Carolina.

Asheville Avl (38 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Asheville Avl
Asheville Avl (38 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Asheville Avl has fewer employees than the Trucking, general freight, long-distance median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.5 5.7 3 0 0
2023 4.7 4.7 2 0 0
2022 7.2 7.2 3 0 0
2021 7.8 5.2 3 0 0
2020 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2019 4.6 4.6 2 0 0
2018 4.4 2.2 2 0 0
2017 20.6 9.1 9 0 0
2016 19.0 15.2 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · NC · Asheville

3,020 Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 290 employers in Asheville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hermon/Bangor Terminal 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Transport of Ohio - 447 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABF Freight 041 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6284-HL-SI 9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Morganton Hatchery 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harris Energy & Environmental Center 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enerdyne Power Systems, Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Utilities (8100) 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Hospital; MH Hospital Manager, LLC 8,097 FTE
CITY-NEAR Biltmore Workforce Management 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Medical Associates 1,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Care Partners 1,018 FTE
NAT-TCR Carroll Construction Supply - Naperville 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Playworld - New Berlin 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR United County Industries Corporation 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #97 9.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Peachtree Construction, Ltd. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Division 56 and 69-Plano 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hay Road Energy Center 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Health Care Products, Inc. 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.