Oxygen equipment rental (i.e. home use) · Florida

Asheville NC 90-03-14-15

Clearwater, FL · ~26 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Asheville NC 90-03-14-15 runs at 496% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Oxygen equipment rental (i.e. home use) workplace, earning a grade F.

Asheville NC 90-03-14-15: 6.9 TCR = 496% of Oxygen equipment rental (i.e. home use) BLS 1.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Asheville NC 90-03-14-15 safety composite

Asheville NC 90-03-14-15 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2016→2022

Asheville NC 90-03-14-15 injury rate improved

Asheville NC 90-03-14-15's TCR fell 2.9 from 7.8 in 2016 to 4.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 9.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.8 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=9.8 · 2020=4.0 · 2021=9.8 · 2022=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 532291 · Clearwater, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 496% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #43/47
  • PHOTO Lincare -Worcester -…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lincare -Worcester - 0000480 (0.6 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Asheville NC 90-03-14-15 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Asheville NC 90-03-14-15 averages 6.9 TCR (496% of the Oxygen equipment rental (i.e. home use) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Asheville NC 90-03-14-15 TCR series: 2016=7.8 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=9.8 · 2020=4 · 2021=9.8 · 2022=4.9 · BLS 1.4

Where Asheville NC 90-03-14-15 falls in its industry

78 Oxygen equipment rental (i.e. establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 47 Oxygen equipment rental (i.e. employers in Florida.

Asheville NC 90-03-14-15 (26 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 26 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Asheville NC 90-03-14-15
Asheville NC 90-03-14-15 (26 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 26 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Asheville NC 90-03-14-15 has more employees than the Oxygen equipment rental (i.e. home use) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.9 4.9 1 0 0
2021 9.8 9.8 2 0 0
2020 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2019 9.8 3.3 3 0 0
2018 5.4 2.7 2 0 0
2017 6.7 6.7 2 0 0
2016 7.8 7.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

532291 · FL · Clearwater

78 Oxygen equipment rental (i.e. home use) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 548 employers in Clearwater, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lincare -Worcester - 0000480 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Montgomery AL Enteral 90-63-38-11 Secure Health Systems 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ft Wayne IN 90-324524/054524 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakewood CO PHC/Founders Medical 871604 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cooperative Producers, Inc. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cherrylake Inc. - VB 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE HAULING 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE J & J Sugar Harvesters Inc 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morton Plant Hospital (2100) 3,648 FTE
CITY-NEAR BayCare Health System (0020) 3,171 FTE
CITY-NEAR TD SYNNEX Clearwater 2,583 FTE
CITY-NEAR Resale Shoppe Countryside 2,476 FTE
NAT-TCR Medical Center Enterprise 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR HG114 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 545642-Moses Lake Po 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 542774-Eve-Hub Sta 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4598-Rtc Ardmore 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Supply Technologies- Suwanne 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Franklin Place 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Urbana Place 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.