Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · New York

Ashton Place

Clifton Springs, NY · ~50 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ashton Place runs at 159% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Ashton Place: 6.0 TCR = 159% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ashton Place safety composite

Ashton Place scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−22.8

2016→2024

Ashton Place injury rate improved

Ashton Place's TCR fell 22.8 from 22.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 22.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=22.8 · 2017=12.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Clifton Springs, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 159% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #41/98
  • PHOTO Garden Villas South
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Garden Villas South (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Ashton Place in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ashton Place averages 6.0 TCR (159% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ashton Place TCR series: 2016=22.8 · 2017=12.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Ashton Place falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 98 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New York.

Ashton Place (50 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ashton Place
Ashton Place (50 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Ashton Place has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2021 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2020 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 6.3 6.3 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 12.9 6.4 4 0 0
2016 22.8 3.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NY · Clifton Springs

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 12 employers in Clifton Springs, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Garden Villas South 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chesterbrook Residences 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belmont Village Sabre Springs 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Covenant Living of Colorado 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Construction Group 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vacri Construction Corporation 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rifenburg Contracting Corporation 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lancaster Development, Inc. 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clifton Springs Hosp and Long Term Care 726 FTE
CITY-NEAR G.W. Lisk 655 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clifton Springs Hospital 621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Willow Bend Farm 83 FTE
NAT-TCR 5190 Fresenius Medical Care 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Wake Forest 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kentucky Transport 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Jon Edwards Steel 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Feroleto Steel Company Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sanders-Sr Living Community 5451 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hays Service Center 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jena Tool Inc 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.