Local letter and parcel delivery services (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) · Washington

ASLAR Logistics

Puyallup, WA · ~80 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ASLAR Logistics runs at 317% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Local letter and parcel delivery services (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) workplace, earning a grade F.

ASLAR Logistics: 14.3 TCR = 317% of Local letter and parcel delivery services (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ASLAR Logistics safety composite

ASLAR Logistics scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 14.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
D 10.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.2

2022→2024

ASLAR Logistics injury rate improved

ASLAR Logistics's TCR fell 9.2 from 20.1 in 2022 to 10.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 20.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=20.1 · 2023=11.9 · 2024=10.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492210 · Puyallup, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.3 · 317% of ind

  • DART 10.8 DART
  • RANK #15/35
  • PHOTO Samuel August Logist…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Samuel August Logistics LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

ASLAR Logistics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ASLAR Logistics averages 14.3 TCR (317% of the Local letter and parcel delivery services (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ASLAR Logistics TCR series: 2022=20.1 · 2023=11.9 · 2024=10.8 · BLS 4.5

Where ASLAR Logistics falls in its industry

1,452 Local letter and parcel delive establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 11.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 35 Local letter and parcel delive employers in Washington.

ASLAR Logistics (80 employees, TCR 14.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate ASLAR Logistics
ASLAR Logistics (80 employees, TCR 14.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8

ASLAR Logistics has fewer employees than the Local letter and parcel delivery service median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 11.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.8 10.8 9 0 0
2023 11.9 11.9 8 0 0
2022 20.1 20.1 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492210 · WA · Puyallup

1,452 Local letter and parcel delivery services (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 172 employers in Puyallup, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Samuel August Logistics LLC 14.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primetech Logistics LLC 14.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transportation 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Symx Logistics 14.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE PSE, SKA - Skagit Service Center 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kitsap Public Utility #1 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Toth Construction 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Office 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR MultiCare Good Samaritan Hospital (Company 15) 2,748 FTE
CITY-NEAR Good Samaritan Hospital 2,622 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA014 1,248 FTE
CITY-NEAR SEFNCO Communications 999 FTE
NAT-TCR Samuel August Logistics LLC 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Summerset Marine Construction 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Via, Inc. 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Flpor - Port Richey Center 14.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE McCutcheon Entprises, Inc. 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #0098 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bostik Dublin 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kamps Pallets Aurora 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.