Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Aspen Ridge Memory Care

Bend, OR · ~41 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aspen Ridge Memory Care runs at 348% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Aspen Ridge Memory Care: 13.2 TCR = 348% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aspen Ridge Memory Care safety composite

Aspen Ridge Memory Care scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−43.3

2016→2022

Aspen Ridge Memory Care injury rate improved

Aspen Ridge Memory Care's TCR fell 43.3 from 43.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 43.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=43.3 · 2017=11.3 · 2018=14.8 · 2019=8.7 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Bend, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.2 · 348% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #152/218
  • PHOTO Mary Ann Morse at He…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mary Ann Morse at Heritage (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Aspen Ridge Memory Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aspen Ridge Memory Care averages 13.2 TCR (348% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aspen Ridge Memory Care TCR series: 2016=43.3 · 2017=11.3 · 2018=14.8 · 2019=8.7 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Aspen Ridge Memory Care falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #152 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Aspen Ridge Memory Care (41 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Aspen Ridge Memory Care
Aspen Ridge Memory Care (41 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Aspen Ridge Memory Care has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.2 6.2 1 1 0
2020 8.3 8.3 2 1 0
2019 8.7 8.7 3 0 0
2018 14.8 14.8 5 0 0
2017 11.3 11.3 3 0 0
2016 43.3 16.8 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Bend

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 254 employers in Bend, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mary Ann Morse at Heritage 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-62023 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10296 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aegis of Newcastle 13.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schwope Brothers West Coast 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE JR Simplot Company-ZX Ranch 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Logging 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE LBA Contract Cutting Inc 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Charles Health System Bend 3,592 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mt. Bachelor 569 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Charles Health System Redmond 505 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lonza Bend Inc, 438 FTE
NAT-TCR 366992-Shallotte Po 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Blaine Brothers, Inc. - N.A. Trailer Sales - IGH 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 182428-Dsm-East Side Carrier Anx 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 261101-Bra-Baxter Carrier Anx 13.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2253-H4211 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2253-H7662 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1855-AHSCM18 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sun Coast Resources Kilgore 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.